Thursday, May 5, 2011

MCC UNIT PRESIDENT TOM POLLIZI WINS CHANCELLOR'S AWARD

CSEA Local 828 Unit 7402
President Tom Pollizi
photo:  Ove Overmyer
MCC Names 2011 Chancellor's Award Recipients 

Rochester, N.Y.-- Congratulations to CSEA Monroe County Local 828 Unit 7402 President Tom Pollizi who was selected to receive the 2011 MCC Chancellor’s Award for excellence in service. Tom is a Driver/Mover in the Shipping and Receiving Department at the Brighton Campus.

The selection criteria for each of these awards are rigorous and exacting. It ensures that only those University faculty, professional and classified staff who have consistently demonstrated superlative performance within and beyond their position receive these awards. Recipients of these awards serve as a source of great pride to MCC and inspiration for us all.

Mr. Pollizi will be formally recognized at the Employee Recognition Ceremony on June 1st.

CSEA MONROE COUNTY LOCAL 828 ANNOUNCES 2011 GEORGE M. GROWNEY SCHOLARSHIP AWARD WINNERS

Rochester, N.Y.-- The CSEA Monroe County Local 828 Executive Board and the Local 828 Scholarship Committee are pleased to announce the winners of the 2011 George M. Growney Scholarship Awards.

Since 1993, CSEA Local 828 has awarded over $100,000.00 in scholarship prize money to assist our area's working families. In 1994, the Monroe County Employees Unit 7400, the largest Unit in the Local, created their own scholarship program and has distributed more than $20,000.00.  CSEA Local 828 is comprised of 21 Units throughout the Monroe County area, and represents nearly 3,500 workers.  

And new this year, the City of Rochester Library Workers Unit 7420 created the Jane McManus Scholarship fund, however no appplicants met the minimum standard qualifications. This $200 annual award will roll over to 2012.

Mr. Growney was a long time labor leader and activist who was employed as a probation officer with Monroe County. He served as local president for nearly two decades before his retirement in 1995. George had a passion for kids to succeed, and would be proud that his union brothers and sisters have carried on his legacy of love and commitment to youth. George M. Growney died on August 10, 1997. The scholarship program was named in his honor the following year after his death.

The scholarship is open to graduating high school seniors whose parents and caregivers are members or agency shop fee payers of Monroe County Local 828.

The scholarship committee worked very hard to review many detailed entries again this year. Scholarships applicants were judged on academic achievement, a written essay, financial need and potential.

This year's award recipients will be honored at the Annual Scholarship Dinner on May 16, 5:30 at the Webster Highway Department, Webster, N.Y.  For more information about this event, please call Barb at 585.328.5250.

Here are the winners:

 
  click on document for a larger view.

Monday, May 2, 2011

2011-12 CITY OF ROCHESTER BUDGET PRIORITIES: PAINTING A BIGGER PICTURE

Rochester, N.Y. -- This might be what some would call painting a picture with broad brush strokes, but nonetheless here we go. If you want to find specific budget number crunching, you won't see it here in this commentary.  Not yet, anyway.  That is reserved for later, after Mayor Richards’ budget plan is revealed on May 20. But what you will find here, however, are some thoughts that we all need to keep in mind when we finally decide how we appropriate city tax payer dollars in the years to come.

We all understand that we have to spend less because of reduced revenue, but it's how we exact our priorities and how we decide to use our resources wisely becomes the bigger question when trying to balance local budgets.

First of all, the City of Rochester budget comes in at around 465.3 million. That is not chump change. Approximately 3.5 million dollars goes to funding the 10 city branch libraries-- that is less than 2 percent of the total budget. For every New York state tax dollar spent on libraries, residents get back nearly 13 dollars of services. Look it up here.

The Highland Branch Library circulates
nearly 94,000 library materials a year.
photo:  courtesy RPL
Now let's take the Highland Branch Library for example: operating costs come in around $265,000 a fiscal year. According to ROC DOC's, that amount equals the yearly salary and benefits of two top confidential/management employees for the City of Rochester. The Highland Branch Library, which has been proposed for possible closure, touches and embraces tens of thousands of residents each year-- as does all the neighborhood libraries. So, I will now publicly ask, where are our priorities? Does this approach satisfy the greater good of the community?

A community philosophy and a couple of questions

When local governments talk of municipal budget decisions, we are truly following a community philosophy-- it's about what's true, personal responsibility, inclusion, opportunity and a fair shake at the American Dream.

For every citizen who cares about our great city-- the message could not be clearer. The big question is what kind of city do we want to live in? Will my tax dollars provide me and my family with a fair return on my investment? Above all, what I really want is for me and my family to live in a city that we can believe in.

Another question that needs to be addressed is how the progressive moral system defines the democratic ideals of America and our city. What were the principles it was founded on and how do those ideals apply to specific issues we as taxpayers care about? Our collective moral vision, when applied to the budget, is more general with everyone who shares that same moral vision of what we call American democracy.

In the first place, should our budget priorities contradict the moral vision of why our city is one of the best mid-size cities in America? I think not.

Today, our real economic issues are jobs, economic recovery and finding a remedy for the inadequate distribution of wealth and services that has created a fragmented class structure here in Rochester. It also wouldn't hurt to create an environment whereby citizens could contribute to the property tax rolls by owning their own business or buying a home. Our city will not survive without a strong, vibrant middle-class. The real issues here are existential questions: what is Rochester at heart and what will we become?

Our collective vision for Rochester should shape the budget discussion

In 2005, former mayor Bob Duffy laid out these moral principles as well as anyone ever has and roused our neighbors in support of his vision for OneCity. In his first term as Mayor, he focused on pragmatics and policy-- public safety, education and economic development. He was a huge literacy and library supporter too-- he knew how important our libraries were to the neighborhoods.

When it came to education, the attacks by his nay-sayers, to some degree, were moderately successful even though most residents thought mayoral control of RCSD would be a more pragmatic approach for an out-of-control school system. The lesson here is that morality at the general level beats out policy at the particular level. The reason is our residents identify themselves simply as moral beings, not policy wonks.

All politics is moral. Political leaders put forth proposals on the assumption that their proposals are the right thing to do. Obviously, progressives and radical conservatives have very different beliefs when it comes to understanding what is right and what is wrong and how to spend our tax dollars.

The main idea here is this: The history of our democracy and our city is based on empathy-- that is, citizens caring about each other and acting on that care; taking responsibility not just for themselves but for their families, communities and their city. The role of government is to carry out this principle in three ways: personal and material protections, public services and individual empowerment.

Our taxes help us do together what we cannot do alone

To do together what we cannot do as well for ourselves is at the heart of civility and life here in Rochester. It's what I also call pride and patriotism. The American belief ... that each one of us deserves some basic measure of security... that no matter how responsibly we live our lives, hard time or bad luck, crippling illness or a layoff, it may strike any one of us at any time. This is what our government is for—to assist our fellow citizens in times of crisis. This is what we should be spending our 465 million dollars on. This is why our safety-nets called Medicare, Social Security and Medicaid should always prevail.

The fact is, our New York State tax codes and loopholes have been favoring those with substantial wealth-- the tax system is highly unfair and that needs to change.
 
Kids play at the Flint St.
Recreation playground.
photo:  City of Rochester
The greatness of our city will be measured by us carrying out such moral commitments as public safety with our fire and police departments, access to our community libraries, clean streets and the right of a child to get a great education and have an after school program to nourish their spirit.

We need to rethink those ideals every time we assess our budget priorities-- this is a time when other cities and municipalities across America are defunding and attacking immigrants, the poor, elderly, the disabled, labor unions, people of color, the environment and everything up and in-between. That's not us-- that's not Rochester, N.Y.

Moral arguments can, and should, always be given for all budget policies at all levels of government on all issues we care about: the environment, marriage equality, education, health care, civil rights, family planning, organizing rights, voting rights, immigration, and so forth.

It is only by repetition of these moral principles that the citizenry begins to understand how all these ideas fit together as realizations of the same basic democratic principles I believe our forefathers intended as an edict for future generations to live by.

The very idea of taxes

What is missing from this painted picture is any sense of a larger meaning in the act of paying taxes. Most other things that require effort and sacrifice-- family, service, charity, and volunteerism-- have virtuous, or at least redeeming, meaning associated with them. That meaning helps us face life’s challenges with a sense of a larger purpose that makes these acts worth the sacrifice.

The stories we tell about why we pay taxes reflect a chronic disconnection from our role as citizens; they are devoid of any civic meaning. The real meaning of taxes pays for the things that underpin our public life and connect us to one another through our communities, our states and our country.

The Rochester I know

The Rochester I know is generous and compassionate; a city of opportunity and optimism. We take responsibility for ourselves and each other; for the city and county we want and for the future we share. We are the city that is home to civil rights icons-- and if anything, we honor diversity, fairness and inclusion.

LABOR DAY PARADE IN ROCHESTER, N.Y.
Marchers walk down East Main Street in downtown
Rochester on September 6, 2010 for the Labor Day Parade.
photo:  Ove Overmyer
Our local universities lead the world in medical and scientific research and technological breakthroughs that have transformed millions of lives. It has been said that Rochester is home to the best library and park systems in the nation. We are one of the most giving cities in the world. We consistently rank as one of the best places to live, work and raise a family.

And, this all happens because we understand that the shared sacrifices we make as individual tax payers pay for the services we so desperately want for our families and for our neighborhoods. This is who we are. This is the Rochester I know. We don’t have to choose between a future of rising debt and one where we forfeit investments in our people and our city.

To meet our fiscal budget challenges, sure, we will need to make reforms and we will eventually get it done. But, at whose expense? Indeed, all city residents will need to make sacrifices-- all of us have been doing that for many years so this should not come as a shock to anyone who is paying attention. But we do not have to sacrifice the Rochester we believe in.

In conclusion, once you close a branch library or reduce hours of operation at a recreation center-- there is no going back. Because library advocacy efforts can't be measured through financial success, and our results are often so frustratingly unquantifiable, libraries will remain an easy target.

Rochester takes pride in its public services. Let's not turn our back on those citizens who need us most-- immigrants, women, children, the elderly, people of color and the disenfranchised. Let's keep moving in the right direction and not stray from the course that former Mayor Bob Duffy created for us-- OneCity Rochester. That’s the city I believe in.  That's the city I know we can become.

Finally, I know what you are thinking and the answer is no.  I never drink Kool-Aid.

-Ove Overmyer
The author is CSEA President, City of Rochester Library Workers Local 828 Unit 7420.  The opinions expressed above are the authors exclusively and do not reflect the views of CSEA as an organization.

Saturday, April 30, 2011

CSEA LOCAL 828 WOMEN'S COMMITTEE HOST "AWESOME" WORKSHOP AT MONROE COMMUNITY COLLEGE

AWESOME WOMEN TELL THEIR INSPIRATIONAL STORIES
Presenters were left to right:  MCC President Dr. Anne Kress, Monroe County
Medical Examiner Dr. Caroline R. Dignan, CSEA Local 828 Women's Committee Chair Angela Muscianese, Senior Extension Associate Cornell ILR Linda Donahue and President of the Associate Board for Gilda's Club of Rochester Erin Julian.  photo:  Ove Overmyer 
Rochester, N.Y.--  On Saturday, April 30, three dozen men and women from the Rochester area gathered at Monroe Community College for a workshop discussion titled, "Awesome Women:  Past, Present and Future."  The event was sponsored by the CSEA Monroe County Local 828 Women's Committee.

Workshop attendees listen intently to Monroe County Medical Examiner
Dr. Caroline R. Dignan talk about balencing her career and family life.
photo:  Ove Overmyer
Speakers at the workshop included Dr. Anne Kress, Monroe Community College; Linda Donahue, Cornell ILR; Dr. Caroline Dignan, Monroe County Medical Examiner’s Office; and Erin Julian, Gilda’s Club of Rochester.  Donahue gave attendees some labor history notes on women trailblazers, including the contributions of Mother Jones, Rose Schneiderman and Frances Perkins.  The presenters told very poignant and inspirational stories of the trials and tribulations of working women-- they detailed a personal narrative explaining how they manage to balance a professional career, family and personal interests.

For more photos of this event and other CSEA Monroe County Local 828 images, you can visit our Flickr photostream.

Quotes and words worth remembering but not limited to:

Linda Donahue: Quoting labor icon and feminist Rose Schneiderman right after witnessing women throwing themselves out of the ninth floor windows of the burning NYC Asch Building during the tragic Triangle Shirtwaist Factory fire in 1911 that killed 146 garment workers, "Life is so cheap and property is so sacred." 

Dr. Anne Kress:  "Become part of something that is bigger than yourself.  In your personal journey, know when your opportunities exist and be prepared to ask yourself what do you want to give up?  And, behind every great woman is herself."

Camille Julian:  "I always told my children that the road you take in life will always be a journey forward."

Dr. Anne Kress:  "College readiness begins before kindergarten."

Linda Donahue: When referring to the enactment of early 20th century labor laws, "Laws are often used against us as well as for us."

Dr. Caroline R. Dignan:  When asked about weighing the difference between the public or private sector medical arenas, she repsonded,   "I never considered the money when I decided to follow my dream to study forensic pathology."

Erin Julian:  "Everyone can make a difference in your community-- all you have to do is volunteer."

Angela Muscianese:  "Awesome."

photo:  Ove Overmyer

Thursday, April 28, 2011

SPECIAL COMMENTARY: A "DEAD PLAN WALKING"

Rochester, N.Y.-- It’s bad enough that House Republicans voted to destroy Medicare and replace it with an inadequate voucher scheme. But now, non-partisan analysts have revealed that this GOP budget plan actually increases the national debt by hundreds of billions of dollars over the next ten years-- and it still forces seniors to pay thousands of dollars out-of-pocket and potentially cuts off health care coverage completely for millions of Americans.

However, the American people are starting to pay attention to the absurdity of the radical GOP Ryan Plan. The House GOP is telling us, "we know what's best for you," but obviously, "no they don't."  They are merely delivering the goods to the small minority of people and corporations with astronomical wealth who got them elected in the first place.  They have no regard for the welfare or common good of the American people. 

In town hall meetings being held across the country during Congress' two-week recess, citizens of all stripes are filling the ears of Republican legislators with objections to their supporting such garbage, particularly the proposed changes to Medicare that would replace direct coverage with subsidies for private insurance.  Plus, the GOP approves of billion dollar tax payer subsidies for big oil and pharma-- like they actually need more of our money.  When does the greed stop?

Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pennsylvania, quoted in a New York Times article Tuesday, tried to play down the objections, but his explanation inadvertently exposed the flaw in his party's political strategy.

"I am not sensing the general public is angered over Medicare reform," he insisted. "When I explain that people over 55 are not affected there is almost a sigh of relief."

In other words, Barletta believes his constituents will only tolerate "reform" when it does not personally affect them. Sheesh.

This offhand acknowledgement belies the obvious truth that Republicans hate to admit: Americans actually like their government health insurance, and they do not trust for-profit insurance companies to do it better. They like their "socialized medicine" so much that they're willing to give lip service to anyone who threatens to take it away.

And another thing-- Medicare belongs to all Americans, not just the population who are receiving the benefits right now. Most of us working stiffs who do not have it now are counting on its support in our old age-- if we don't die on the job first because the GOP wants to raise the retirement age.

The over-55 provision only serves to validate citizens' objections. Even if the exception pacifies seniors, by emphasizing it Republicans implicitly acknowledge that the proposed subsidy plan is not equivalent to Medicare as we know it. On top of this, they overtly recognize the fact that Americans under 55 will get screwed.

A study by the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office found that future retirees would pay much more under Ryan's plan than under traditional Medicare-- and that's exactly what the for-profit healthcare companies desire.  By 2030, for example, a typical 65-year-old would pay two-thirds of his or her health costs.

If Republicans had been honest about their message of shared sacrifice to address the national debt, all their "deficit reduction hyperbole" could of attracted some reasonable listeners. But that's not what is happening, no matter how much they try to downplay the push back. When they combine Medicare cuts with tax breaks for the rich, they have run amok and violated one of the most basic rules of democratic politics: most people vote for their own best interest. Not all do of course-- remember the book, "What's the Matter With Kansas?" When 400 rich-as-can-be families have the same wealth as 155 million other Americans, you know we are headed in the wrong direction when it comes to stabilizing a middle-class economy.

Voters will not stand for something they personally value to be taken away from them and at the same time, give benefits to rich people and multi-billion dollar health insurance companies who are wallowing in sizable profits. How can they think that this is a winning strategy for them politically or for the American people? But it begs another question-- maybe it's not about the America we know and love.

A few weeks ago, Republicans' attempts to gut federal programs like Head Start and Planned Parenthood provoked little outrage from the average American voter. That's because most Americans do not perceive themselves to benefit from the programs. Similarly, President George W. Bush's attempt to slash Medicaid while extending tax cuts for the rich did not ignite much town hall fervor, because Medicaid assists people below the poverty line. The last time we checked, poor people do not have as many paid lobbyists filling the halls of Congress or the statehouses across America as most multi-national corporations.

We here at the Voice Reporter have been accused on this site as stoking a class warfare mentality.  We will wear that badge of honor with distinction.  But when it comes to fairness of taxes and the battle for resources between the haves and have-nots, middle-class Americans might not seem completely engaged because some of them could be doing ok right now-- they just find it hard to invest in something that doesn't directly affect them.  For those of you who are not engaged, let the Ryan Plan be a warning shot-- your day of reckoning is coming if the GOP controls the Senate in 2012.

The challenge for most of us is to understand these complex issues in the simplest way possible. If we restore a vision for America that is based on the premise that material prosperity and social justice are not competing values, we might get a better handle on bringing everyone together to build a better world.

When Republicans proposed to cut Medicare while reducing taxes for the rich, they lost all credibility with the American people. This is simple to understand. Americans and the voting public get this one. Republicans will lose this fight. And so, we here at the Voice Reporter can now officially call the Republican budget proposal a "dead plan walking."

-Ove Overmyer
This post is the opinion of the author exclusively and does not reflect the views of CSEA as an organization.