Sunday, May 19, 2013
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
A GUIDE FOR UNION NEGOTIATORS
The Affordable Care Act (ACA), the health reform law passed in March 2010, includes many provisions that will impact employer-based insurance and union health plans in particular. Some provisions are already effective, while others are not effective until 2014 or 2018. The ACA could potentially impact the next few rounds of contract negotiations for many unions depending on the specific contract expiration dates. This guide describes some of the key provisions of the ACA as they apply to union plans, outlines the Implementation timeline, and discusses considerations for union negotiators.
This guide is based on our understanding of the law and related regulations as of March 2012. This guide will be updated as regulations implementing the law continue to be finalized and further information about the intent of the law becomes available.
The ACA introduces new standards for employer-sponsored health plans. The implementation dates for these requirements vary based on the plan’s effective date, whether the plan is subject to a Collective Bargaining Agreement (CBA), and whether the plan is self-insured or fully-insured.
Grandfathered plans: Plans that had enrollees as of March 23, 2010, may be grandfathered. Some requirements will not apply to grandfathered plans, while other provisions apply to grandfathered plans on the same date they become effective for all plans. Certain changes to plan design will nullify a plan’s grandfathered status, such as: elimination of benefits for certain conditions, certain increases in cost sharing (any increase in coinsurance percentage, an increase in deductible or out-of-pocket limit by more than 15 percent plus medical inflation, or an increase in co-payment by more than $5 adjusted for medical inflation or 15 percent plus medical inflation, whichever is greater), increases in employee share of premium by more than 5 percentage points, or certain changes in annual benefits limits.
These limits are applied on a cumulative basis, not an annual basis.
Plan Requirements: Changes to premiums, changes made to comply with federal or state laws, or changes in third party administrator will not cause a plan to lose its grandfathered status. Employers that change insurers can maintain grandfathered status as long as the new plan has similar cost sharing and benefits as the original plan.The grandfathering rules apply separately to each benefit package under a health plan. The White House predicts that between one- and two-thirds of large group plans will remain grandfathered by 2013.1 For more information, see the grandfathering regulation.
Collectively bargained plans: Fully-insured plans pursuant to a CBA are grandfathered until the last expiration date of a CBA related to that coverage. Multi-employer plans are grandfathered until the last expiration date of a CBA related to that plan regardless of employer. Grandfathered status may be maintained upon the CBA expiration date if no changes were made since March 23, 2010, that would have otherwise caused the plan to lose its grandfathered status. For more information, see the grandfathering regulation.
Self-insured plans: Self-insured plans subject to a CBA are not eligible for the same delayed implementation as collectively bargained fully-insured plans. All self-insured plans are exempt from some plan requirements, as noted below. For more information, see the grandfathering regulation.
Grandfathered plans are exempt from the following requirements until the plan loses its grandfathered status:
Preventive services: Plans must offer first-dollar coverage (no co-payment or deductible) for certain preventive services effective now. Examples of preventive services covered under this provision include blood pressure, diabetes, and cholesterol tests; many cancer screenings; certain types of health counseling; certain routine vaccines; flu and pneumonia shots; pregnancy counseling, screening, and vaccines; and well-baby and well-child visits. The White House estimates that this provision will increase premiums by 1.5 percent, on average. See the list of covered preventive services. For more information, see the preventive services regulation.
Patient protections: Plans are prohibited from requiring a referral to see an obstetrician/gynecologist and from requiring prior authorization or higher cost sharing for out-of-network emergency services, effective now. These protections are already existing law in California. For more information, see the Patient’s Bill of Rights regulation.
Out-of-pocket maximums: Group plans must limit out-of-pocket costs to $6,050 for single coverage and $12,100 for family coverage (2012 dollars) effective in 2014 for non-grandfathered plans. Self-insured plans are exempt.
Pricing: For small group plans (100 or fewer employees), medical underwriting is prohibited and rating variation is only allowed based on age (3:1 ratio), tobacco use (1.5:1.0),family composition, and geography effective in 2014. In states permitting large group plans in the exchange in 2017, these pricing standards will apply to all fully-insured large group plans in and out of the exchange. Self-insured plans are exempt.
Deductibles: Small group plans (100 or fewer employees) must limit deductibles to $2,000 for single coverage and $4,000 for family coverage beginning in 2014 for non-grandfathered plans. Self-insured plans are exempt.
Minimum services covered: Fully-insured small group plans (100 or fewer employees) in and out of the exchange and large group plans in the exchange must cover preventive and primary care, emergency, hospital, physician, outpatient, maternity and newborn care, pediatric (including dental and vision), medical/surgical care, prescription drugs, lab, and mental health and substance abuse, effective in 2014 for non-grandfathered plans. States have the flexibility to set the benchmarks within each category. For more information see the HHS news release.
Some requirements are implemented on the same date for all plans, regardless of plan effective date or whether the plan is collectively bargained.
No lifetime or annual limits: Plans are prohibited from limiting the lifetime dollar value of benefits effective the first day of the next plan year beginning after September 23, 2010. Annual limits are restricted to no less than $750,000 beginning September 23, 2010, $1.25 million beginning September 23, 2011, and $2 million beginning September 23, 2012, and are banned completely beginning January 1, 2014. The annual limit requirements do not apply to grandfathered individual plans.
To ensure that individuals with limited benefit plans continue to have access to affordable insurance, some plans received temporary waivers of the annual limit restrictions through 2013. See the current list of approved waivers. The White House predicts that the ban on lifetime limits will increase premiums by 0.5 percent or less and the annual limit restrictions will increase premiums by 0.1 percent or less. For more information, see the Patient’s Bill of Rights regulation.
Dependents under age 26: Plans must allow adult children under age 26 to enroll in a parent’s plan effective now. Adult children are eligible without regard to financial dependency, residence, student status or employment. Married children are eligible to enroll in a parent’s plan, though their spouses are not. Coverage is exempt from taxes through the end of the tax year in which the adult child turns 26. Through 2013, grandfathered group plans do not need to provide coverage to dependents that have health insurance available through their employer no matter the price or quality of the employer’s insurance. For more information, see the Dependent Coverage regulation and IRS guidance.
Plan administrative costs: Plans must provide rebates to consumers if the percentage of premiums spent on medical services and activities to improve health care quality falls below 85 percent for large group plans or 80 percent for small group plans (or higher standard set by state, if applicable) beginning in 2011. Self-insured plans are exempt. For more information, see the Medical Loss Ratio regulation.
Employers with more than 200 full-time employees must automatically enroll employees into a plan unless they opt out of coverage. The law does not specify which plan employers offering multiple plans should automatically enroll employees in, making this a potential subject for collective bargaining. Unions and employers are also likely to want to negotiate over the specific way in which employees are notified and given the opportunity to opt out of coverage. This provision will be effective once final regulations are issued, which the Department of Labor does not expect to happen in time to take effect in 2014.
Waiting periods of more than 90 days are banned in 2014 for all plans, including grandfathered plans and self-insured plans. Employers that currently require waiting periods that are significantly longer than 90 days may face increased costs in order to bring the plan into compliance. An initial federal notice suggests that employers that offer coverage would not be subject to penalties during the first three months after an employee’s date of hire if the waiting period applies during that time. The notice indicates that employers could require a specified number of cumulative hours for eligibility for coverage below a to-be-determined limit, after which the 90-day waiting period would begin.
Under the ACA, employers are not required to provide coverage to any employee or dependent, but if an employee receives subsidized coverage in the exchange the employer may be subject to a penalty, beginning in 2014. An employee is eligible for the exchange if they are lawfully present in the U.S. That coverage may be subsidized if the employee’s family income is less than 400 percent of the Federal Poverty Level ($44,680 for an individual and $92,200 for a family of four in 2012). Employees below 133 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (approximately $14,860 for an individual, $30,660 for a family of four in 2012) may be eligible for Medicaid.
Employees are only eligible for subsidies in the exchange if they are not offered affordable coverage by their employer. Coverage is considered unaffordable if an employer requires a contribution greater than 9.5 percent of family income or offers a plan that covers less than 60 percent of medical costs on average. Under proposed regulations, if self-only coverage costs less than 9.5 percent of income and an employer offers dependent coverage, then both employees and their family members are ineligible for subsidies regardless of whether or not family coverage is affordable.
If the regulations are finalized as proposed, union negotiators should consider that an offer of family coverage could prevent dependents’ access to subsidized coverage in the Exchange. Typical union-negotiated health plans are not likely to fall below the actuarial value threshold of 60 percent as the average actuarial value for employer-based plans was 80 percent in 2007 and even high-deductible health plans in the group market had an average actuarial value of 67 percent.
Employers with fewer than 50 full-time equivalent non-seasonal ex-employees are exempt from the employer responsibility penalties.
Large employers not offering coverage to employees and their dependents with at least one full-time employee receiving subsidies in the exchange are required to pay a penalty of $2,000 multiplied by the number of full-time employees minus 30 employees. Large employers offering coverage with at least one full-time employee receiving subsidies in the exchange pay the lesser of $3,000 multiplied by the number of full-time employees receiving subsidies and $2,000 multiplied by the total number of full-time employees minus 30 employees. Full-time is defined as an average of 30 hours or more with respect to any month and non-seasonal is defined as working 120 days or more in a taxable year.
For existing employees, an initial federal notice suggests that full-time status would be determined based on a look-back and stability period not exceeding 12 months. For newly-hired employees, in certain circumstances, employers would have six months to determine whether an employee is full time and would not be subject to penalties during that time, according to an initial federal notice. No employer penalties shall apply for employees enrolled in Medicaid or for employees’ dependents who receive subsidized coverage in the exchange.
Although the ACA does not require that employers contribute towards health plan premiums, the employer’s contribution level has several important implications. The less the employer contributes towards coverage, the greater the number of workers that would be potentially eligible for the exchange and the greater the number of employees for which the employer would potentially pay a $3,000 penalty. Secondly, increasing the worker share of the premium by more than 5 cumulative percentage points would cause the loss of grandfathering status after the CBA expires. Finally, the less the employer contributes towards coverage, the more likely it is that worker contributions to premiums exceed 8 percent of family income, making workers exempt from the individual mandate.
All Taft-Hartley fund plans are subject to a CBA and many are self-insured, making the rules for those plan types especially important for trust funds. A few additional special considerations for Taft-Hartley funds are worth noting. A trust fund may have some plans with grandfathered status and some plans that do not have grandfathered status.
The regulations do not indicate that a Taft-Hartley plan will lose its grandfathered status if a new employer joins, but the impact may be subject to interpretation. Trust funds are likely to be especially attentive to the increased costs related to the new plan requirements as they have a set amount of assets to use to pay out benefits.
It is not yet clear what impact the ban on waiting periods of more than 90 days will have on trust funds that require a minimum number of initial hours worked for eligibility. This may be clarified through regulations.
Some unions will face a decision about whether to bargain for increased wages instead of health benefits. If a large number of union members are eligible for subsidized coverage in the exchange, those workers may be better off receiving the amount an employer would have contributed to their health benefits in the form of higher wages and purchasing subsidized coverage in the exchange. The suitability of this approach will be highly dependent on the specific circumstances of each workplace.
In general, workers and employers may be better off forgoing group health insurance if the cost to the employer of providing group coverage is more than the cost of paying the penalty and providing wage increases sufficient to enable workers to purchase coverage through the exchange after taxes.
However, even when this approach benefits a workforce on average, some individual workers and their families could end up worse off because changes will impact workers unequally. Under the current employer-based health insurance system, single employees subsidize employees with families and younger workers subsidize older workers. Unions that bargain for wage increases in lieu of health benefits would likely bargain for a flat dollar amount increase or an increase as a percentage of wages, but workers’ premium contributions in the exchange would also depend on their overall family income, the size of their family, and their age if they are not subsidy-eligible.
Unions could also consider bargaining for other benefits, such as childcare, that would reach the workers who would be most affected by a non-offer of health benefits. Special consideration should be given in workforces that already have coverage, as a shift to the exchange could create divisions among the workers.
MEDICAID AND SUBSIDY ELIGIBILITY
Families with adjusted gross incomes under 133 percent of the Federal Poverty Level (approximately 14,860 for an individual and $30,660 for a family of four in 2012) will be eligible for Medicaid. Families with incomes between 133 percent and 400 percent FPL ($44,680 for an individual and $92,200 for a family of four in 2012) are eligible for subsidies in the exchange.
Subsidies are provided for premiums and cost sharing. Subsidies are designed to limit the cost of premiums to 3 percent of family income for a family at 133 percent FPL and 9.5 percent of family income for a family at 400 percent FPL. Undocumented workers are not eligible for Medicaid or purchasing coverage in the exchange, whether subsidized or unsubsidized.
Unions should take into account that increasing wages could make some workers ineligible for exchange subsidies and Medicaid due to their higher income, and could reduce the amount that other workers receive in premium and cost sharing subsidies.
COVERAGE OFFERED TO NON-BARGAINING UNIT STAFF
Some employers may want to offer coverage to certain employees but not others. The ACA extends existing Internal Revenue Code Section 105(h) non-discrimination rules, which currently apply only to self-insured plans, to non-grandfathered fully-insured plans, effective six months after enactment. These rules require that plans benefit a significant portion of all employees in order for benefits to be excludable from taxable income. Eligibility for coverage may not discriminate in favor of highly-compensated individuals.
Under these provisions, employers may offer coverage to full-time workers but not part-time workers, except in certain situations in which part-time workers constitute a significant percentage of the workforce. Workers covered under a collective bargaining agreement may be excluded from consideration under the non-discrimination rules if benefits were a subject of good faith bargaining.
Posted by The Voice Reporter at 8:51 AM
Tuesday, May 14, 2013
|Bess Watts, CSEA Local 828 President (2nd from left), stands with scholarship winners for 2013. The awards were presented on May 13, 2103 at picnic supper at Liberty Lodge, Finn Park, Webster, N.Y.photo: Ove Overmyer|
Webster, N.Y.—On May 13, the CSEA Monroe County Local 828 Executive Board and the Local 828 Scholarship Committee hosted the 21th Annual Scholarship Award Dinner at Liberty Lodge in Finn Park, 850 Maple Dr., Webster, N.Y. At the picnic supper, Local officers announced the winners of the CSEA Local 828 George M. Growney Memorial Scholarships, Unit 7400 and the Jane McManus Scholarship Award for 2013. More than $8,200.00 was awarded to deserving area students this year.
Since 1993, CSEA Local 828 has awarded over $120,000.00 in scholarship prize money. In 1993, the Monroe County Employees Unit 7400, the largest Unit in the Local, created their own scholarship program and have distributed an additional $19,500.00.
George M. Growney Scholarships
Mr. Growney was a long time local labor leader and activist. He was employed as a probation officer with Monroe County. He served as local president for nearly two decades before his retirement in 1995. George had a passion for kids to succeed, and would be proud that his union brothers and sisters have carried on his legacy of love and commitment to youth. George M. Growney died on August 10, 1997. The scholarship program was named in his honor the following year after his death.
“This is one of the best things we do as union activists,” said Bess Watts, President of Local 828. She added, “It’s very rewarding to know we are helping our young people succeed in life.”
For a complete list of this year's winners, you can go here.
CSEA Local 828 Scholarships are open to graduating high school seniors whose parents and caregivers are members or agency shop fee payers of Monroe County Local 828. The scholarship committees have reviewed thousands of applications in the past 21 years, demonstrating a significant need of financial resources for young adults continuing their formal education. Scholarships applicants are judged on academic achievement, a written essay, financial need and potential.
Jane McManus Scholarship
Elisabeth Wisse, a graduate of Rush Henrietta High School, was the 2013 recipient of the Jane McManus Scholarship Award. Elisabeth was awarded $200.00 toward her books and school supplies. She will be attending the Onondaga School of Therapeutic Massage in July. Her mother is Lorry Wisse, a 33 year veteran of the Rochester Public Library and works as a clerk at the Central Library of Rochester & Monroe County.
In 1974, Jane McManus started her public service career at the Rochester Public Library as a Senior Library Clerk. While a full-time employee, she also worked in the Literature and Local History Divisions. Shortly thereafter, Jane was promoted to part-time Library Assistant while working in the Reynolds Audio-Visual Department of the Central Library.
In 1991, she transferred to the Winton Branch Library and has been The Story Lady for over two decades.
In 1993, Jane was appointed to the Part-Time Benefits Committee at the Rochester Public Library. In 1995, Jane was one of the founding members who organized and established CSEA Local 828 Unit 7420. Jane was unanimously elected as the first ever President of the City of Rochester Library Workers Unit, where she remained as President of the Unit until April 2006.
Jane remains active in CSEA serving as a Steward, Contract Negotiations Team member, Grievance Rep, member of the Local 828 Health & Safety Committee, and member of the Local 828 Scholarship Committee. She’s a strong advocate for workers’ rights and childhood education. Her CSEA part time library co-workers in Unit 7420 proposed that a scholarship be named in her honor in 2010. They did so knowing full well that Jane's passion, leadership abilities and vision should be forever acknowledged in perpetuity.
Posted by The Voice Reporter at 8:31 AM
Sunday, May 12, 2013
Food Insecurity and Very Low Food Security is real problem and getting worse. In 2011, 50.1 million Americans lived in food insecure households, 33.5 million adults and 16.7 million children.
In 2011, 14.9 percent of households (17.9 million households) were food insecure.
In 2011, 5.7 percent of households (6.8 million households) experienced very low food security.
In 2011, households with children reported food insecurity at a significantly higher rate than those without children, 20.6 percent compared to 12.2 percent.
In 2011, households that had higher rates of food insecurity than the national average included households with children (20.6 percent), especially households with children headed by single women (36.8 percent) or single men (24.9 percent), Black non-Hispanic households (25.1 percent) and Hispanic households (26.2 percent).
In 2011, 8.8 percent of seniors living alone (1 million households) were food insecure.
Food insecurity exists in every county in America, ranging from a low of 5 percent in Steele County, ND to a high of 37 percent in Holmes County, MS.
CSEA Monroe County Local 828 and the Voice Reporter encourage you to call the your member of Congress:
US Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121
To locate your Member on-line:
U.S. House of Representatives: www.house.gov
U.S. Senate: www.senate.gov
White House: http://www.whitehouse.gov/
Posted by The Voice Reporter at 6:23 PM