50 years later, Civil Rights activists connect
to the past and look toward the future
By Ove Overmyer
Washington, D.C. -- They carried signs that screamed “Protect
Voting Rights,” “Jobs for All” and “Love One Another.” They protested the
vigilante killing of an unarmed black teenager from Florida and his killer’s
acquittal. They denounced racial profiling in the country’s largest cities.
Some attendees openly wept at the moving testimonies delivered from the podium
sitting high atop the steps in front of the Lincoln Memorial. Early on in the
day, others stood firm arms folded by the reflecting pool staring with a steely
gaze as they looked toward the large viewing screens
where national leaders shouted words of anger, faith and hope.
A
message of cross-generational common cause extended from 1963 as a recurring
theme. This isn’t 1963 but 2013, when so many of the issues that gave
rise to the March on Washington fifty years ago remain unfulfilled and under
siege today. That’s why, on this summer August day, a broad coalition of civil
rights organizations, unions, progressive groups and Democratic Party leaders
rallied at the National Mall.
Organizers expected 100,000 people to attend the rally and march. The event was homage to a generation of activists that endured fire hoses, police abuse and indignities to demand equality and justice for African Americans.
The National Park Service does not make crowd
estimates and organizers did not immediately respond to request for their own.
After the morning speeches in front of the Lincoln Memorial,
the event organizers and the tens of thousands of activists proceeded to march by
the Martin Luther King Jr. Memorial then on to the Washington Monument to honor
the fiftieth anniversary of the 1963 march and to dramatize
the contemporary fight.
The National Action Network (NAN) was the primary organizer
for the march. Founded by the Rev. Al Sharpton in 1991, NAN is one of the
leading civil rights organizations in the nation with chapters throughout the
entire United States. NAN works within the spirit and tradition of Dr. Martin
Luther King, Jr. to promote a modern civil rights agenda that includes the
fight for one standard of justice, decency and equal opportunities for all
people regardless of race, class, religion, sexual orientation, nationality or
gender identity.
The Supreme Court’s decision gutting the Voting Rights Act
in late June and the acquittal of George Zimmerman less than three weeks later
make this year’s assembly exponentially more urgent with respect to pressuring
Congress and arousing the conscience of the nation.
“Just like a lot of other people who believe the 1963 March
on Washington was one of the most significant events in American history, we
just felt we needed to be part of this today, “ said 71 year-old Michael
Searles of Waynesboro, Ga. He added, “We were not disappointed. The speeches we
very moving, and I especially liked the Rev. Al Sharpton message.”
Searles also referenced a huge need to educate America about
the attack on voting rights. Republicans in southern states, especially North
Carolina are shutting down polling places at college campuses and preventing
students from running for office.
“One of the main
themes today is voting rights, amending state laws like ‘stand your ground’ or
local laws like stop-and-frisk, and the whole question of jobs and
union-busting,” said the Rev. Al Sharpton of the National Action Network, who
convened the march along with Martin Luther King III. He added, “Fifty years
after the original march for jobs and justice, we have a new version of the
same issue. Dreams
are for those who won't accept reality as it is, so they dream of what is not
there and make it possible.”
In 1963, current Georgia Congressman John Lewis—who nearly
died marching for voting rights in Selma, Alabama—was the youngest and most controversial
speaker at the March on Washington. When Lewis returned to the Lincoln Memorial
to address the rally on Saturday, he was the only surviving speaker from that
historic August afternoon. “We have come a great distance since that day,” he
said at the morning session, “but many of the issues that gave rise to that
march are still pressing needs in our society—violence, poverty, hunger,
long-term unemployment, homelessness, voting rights and the need to protect
human dignity.”
At 9:00 am, the steps of the Lincoln Memorial and the National Mall begin to grow to tens of thousands of Civil Rights activists. Photo: Ove Overmyer |
There is conclusive evidence that seven Southern states have
passed or implemented new unconstitutional restrictions that disproportionately
target people of color since the Court’s Voting Rights Act ruling. This follows
a presidential election in which voter-suppression efforts took center stage
and blacks waited twice as long as whites to vote, on average. On a more
structural level, one out of thirteen African-Americans (2.2 million people)
cannot vote because of felon disenfranchisement laws—four times higher than the
rest of the population.
When it comes to the criminal justice system, there are more
black men in prison today than were enslaved in 1850, according to Michelle
Alexander’s The New Jim Crow. African-Americans comprise 13 percent of the
population but made up 55 percent of shooting deaths in 2010. Under Florida’s
“stand your ground” law, “people who killed a black person walked free 73
percent of the time, while those who killed a white person went free 59 percent
of the time,” according to the Tampa Bay Times.
When it comes to the economy, the black unemployment rate
(12.6 percent) is nearly double that of whites (6.6 percent), almost the same
ratio as in 1963. The average household income for African-Americans ($32,068)
lags well below that of white families ($54,620) and declined by 15 percent
from 2000 to 2010.
These jarring statistics show a clear need for a twenty-first-century civil rights movement. “After the march, my hope is we will see more people going home being committed to doing work in their own communities,” says Rochester, N.Y. resident and organized labor leader T. Judith Johnson. She added, “The Moral Mondays protests in North Carolina, the sit-ins by the Dream Defenders in Florida and the spontaneous rallies in 100 cities following the George Zimmerman verdict are evidence of a new wave of civil rights activism. I just feel it.”
“We’re seeing the civil rights movement rise again,” says Searles. Johnson added, “This generation is beginning to understand that we have to get back to organizing and movement-building to create better outcomes for our working families.”
For many years, civil rights organizations like the NAACP
focused on building institutional power through litigation, lobbying and
voting. Though they accomplished a great deal—we now have a two-term
African-American president, after all—there’s a growing realization within the
civil rights community that the protests and civil disobedience that defined
the movement of the 1960s are once again essential to draw more attention to
contemporary problems.
“I wish this activism
had more outbursts than just in North Carolina and Florida,” says civil rights
veteran Julian Bond. “You wish it was twenty times as great, but to see these
things that are going on—it’s exciting. These tactics are tried and true.
They’ve worked in the past, and they’ll work now.”
Yet while the civil rights coalition is more diverse than it
was in 1963—now including supporters from the labor community, women’s rights,
environmental, pro-immigration and LGBT groups—the funds are scarce today even
as the needs are growing. The declining strength of organized labor, which has
accelerated following the passage of anti-union laws in GOP-controlled states
since 2010, has drained the coffers of the organizations most accustomed to
mobilizing masses of people. “The movement is more financially strapped than it
has been in modern memory,” says Ben Jealous of the NAACP.
Another daunting obstacle for the civil rights coalition is
the right wing’s success in promoting the notion that historic remedies for
centuries of discrimination, like the Voting Rights Act and affirmative action,
are no longer needed. “One of the great difficulties we have in helping people
understand where we are on civil rights today is the desire of so many people
to fix the civil rights movement in historical amber and visit it like a
museum, without honoring that movement by being dynamically engaged in the
principles that the movement stood for,” says Sherrilyn Ifill, director-counsel
of the NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, another co-sponsor of the
march.
Despite all the criticism, the 1963 march remains a
singularly important event in American history: the first time the country
really understood what the civil rights movement stood for. The effect was
greatest on the marchers themselves. “Many of the people at the march had never
been to Washington before,” said Julian Bond. “It was evidence to them that
they had done something great and that great things would follow.”
Some fifty years later, “there is, unfortunately, too much
parallel between now and then,” says Jealous. He added, “Now is the moment for
all of us to be re-baptized in the struggle.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.