Governor One Percent fails us again. photo provided. |
On Friday, November 7, Governor One Percent Andrew Cuomo vetoed a
measure that would have expanded a pension credit for veterans who are now
public employees. The bill was to fix an oversight of not being inclusive enough
to include veterans who have served in Somalia, The Balkans or Afghanistan.
The
measure was sponsored in the Senate by Sen. Bill Larkin, a retired Army
colonel, and Assemblywoman Amy Paulin (D- Scarsdale) and was aggressively
supported by CSEA and other public employee unions.
In 2012, Cuomo pushed for a new, less generous pension tier, Tier
VI. Cuomo has also been at odds with the state’s public employee unions since
before taking office in January of 2011. That year, Cuomo had New York’s
workforce agree to cost-savings in labor contracts or risk widespread layoffs.
This veto is yet another action in a long line of efforts to marginalize the
well-being of middle class New Yorkers. If given the opportunity, Governor
Cuomo will stick his bony finger in the eye of any rank and file public
worker—especially if they belong to a union.
Leading up to the announcement on Friday, the governor’s office
leaked several memos of opposition to the pension from conservative think
tanks, lobbyists and the city of New York, which expressed concerns with
expanding the pension credit. There is no doubt these documents were initiated by
his office, but these claims can not be substantiated at this
time. Nevertheless, perhaps cognizant of potential headlines and drama over the
veto, Cuomo’s office released the veto announcement at the classic
news-dump time of after 5 p.m. on Friday-- three days after the mid-term
elections.
Bess Watts, a U.S. Army veteran and Monroe County CSEA Local 828
President says she and her family got a raw deal. “Of course he waited until
after the elections to veto the Veterans Bill. This bill directly impacted me
and many other veterans who have dedicated their lives to public service.” She
added, “I could have bought back three years of service credit for my six years
served in the U.S. Army. This veto is blatantly punitive and should be viewed
for what it truly is—a slap in the face to public employees who honorably
served their country. This action is shameful.”
Under the current law, veterans of the armed forces who served in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam era or in specific combat zones such as Grenada, Panama or the Middle East in the 1980s can qualify for purchasing up to three years of pension service.
Veterans who served in Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Qatar,
United Arab Emirates, Oman, Gulf of Aden, Gulf of Oman, Persian Gulf, Red Sea
and airspace above from 1990 to the present also qualify. Again, the current
law does not allow veterans who served in Afghanistan, The Balkans or Somalia.Under the current law, veterans of the armed forces who served in World War II, the Korean War, and the Vietnam era or in specific combat zones such as Grenada, Panama or the Middle East in the 1980s can qualify for purchasing up to three years of pension service.
In the photo below, one month prior to vetoing a buy-back benefit for Afghanistan troops, Cuomo treks to that very combat zone in the Middle East to get a photo op. It must be noted he couldn't look this soldier in the eye.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.