NAVITECH: 198 PARK AVE., ROCHESTER, N.Y. INTERNATIONAL HEADQUARTERS FOR THE COMPANY WHO HAD NO PREVIOUS CLIENTS AND RECEIVED THE BID FOR 224 MILLION DOLLARS OF TAX PAYER FUNDS |
Rochester, N.Y.-- Three cheers to Rochester’s hometown newspaper for shining a light on an issue that has been burning in the hearts of good government groups for almost a decade.
In today's Sunday edition, they have asked the right question: (Crux of issue: Are LDCs good policy?) but the truth is-- this is not a rhetorical question.
Are these LDC’s created for the greater good or are they just a mechanism to award contracts and our tax dollars to benefit the privileged few who toss donations to the current administration? Has the prolific use of LDC's created a path for personal gain at the expense of the greater Rochester community? The obvious lack of transparency should yield reasonable questions about how we do business in Monroe County. Now more than ever, taxpayers should be asking themselves these important questions.
$224 million dollars is a lot of taxpayer money. Critics say it's being spent on an upgrade that will save only about $10 million dollars over the life of the 20 year contract. Interesting math, huh?
The entrance to the International HQ of Navitech is a detached garage on the property of 198 Park Ave. near Goodman Street. |
This D&C article is a must read:
At its core, the state comptroller's audit of Monroe County's contract with Upstate Telecommunications Corp. questions the appropriateness of using local development corporations to perform public functions.
Local development corporations, or LDCs, are nonprofit organizations, in some cases legal charities, created ostensibly for economic development purposes.
But as they have proliferated in recent years, they have come under greater scrutiny by state officials and watchdog groups as vehicles for local governments to skirt procurement and transparency laws and take debt off their books.
More prevalent
Local development corporations, or LDCs, are nonprofit organizations, in some cases legal charities, created ostensibly for economic development purposes.
But as they have proliferated in recent years, they have come under greater scrutiny by state officials and watchdog groups as vehicles for local governments to skirt procurement and transparency laws and take debt off their books.
More prevalent
The number of LDCs
But questions abound about whether they have saved any money at all.
Auditors found that the county could not provide documentation of savings from the UTC.
A top economist with the Center for Governmental Research in Rochester, which has studied LDCs using a grant from the League of Women Voters, said savings can be difficult to quantify.
"I don't know how you prove that something saves money like this," said CGR President Kent Gardner. (Editor's note: This quote is revealing because CGR is widely known as a right-leaning political think tank.)
New York state Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli is pushing legislation to strengthen his office's oversight of LDCs, though it has so far only been introduced in the Assembly. Although LDCs spend local tax dollars, the comptroller has no authority to audit them, only local governments' relationships to them.
In addition, DiNapoli has proposed prohibiting local governments from leaning too heavily on a provision of the law governing LDCs that describes them as "lessening the burdens of government and acting in the public interest." The clause, which is used routinely in Monroe County and elsewhere, is "overly broad," DiNapoli argues.
The Authorities Budget Office, the state watchdog agency that oversees public authorities, has expanded its role to include oversight of LDCs.
The comptroller would also like contracts between local governments and LDCs be limited to five years.
"Are there problems going on with LDCs?" asked Michael Farrar, deputy director of the state Authorities Budget Office. "I think it's too early to tell the extent, although there have been a number of audits by the Comptroller's Office and good government groups and we've seen indications ourselves that, because there hasn't been a lot of oversight, there is at least the potential for things to go wrong."
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.